So please tell us what's the point ranting again? Just apply the policy for the policy w/o being even _a little bit_ pragmatic? Or do you have yourself some kind of conflict of interest and BlueGriffon itself represents a threat for you, your work, your employer, whatever? I just do not understand you at all, sorry. Nobody stood up to add those data EVEN IF contributions to the deletion page were added, so I added them and they're not questionable. But **you** are the one who requested more data and more references to stop deleting this page. Even w/o the wikipedia policies, I am myself reluctant to edit an article about my own work. There is not one single subjective piece of information added. Terrillja talk 16:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC) Reply all my additions to the page are strictly factual, and verifiable. Which parts are you referring to? SC ( talk) 14:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC) Reply I believe that I have removed the content that is clearly in violation, but I will have to take another look. Reference "It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view." Yes, Daniel clarified the results of the 2010 Open World Forum. contribs) have identified themselves as Daniel Glazman, the author of the software and between the two of them, some spammy material was added.- Terrillja talk 14:51, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Reply. Could this assertion be substantiated please? SC ( talk) 10:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Reply Both Glazou ( talk Reference "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |